Obamanomics: Part One, The Hidden Agenda
Obamanomics: Part Two, The Hidden Agenda
Obamanomics: Part Three, In Defense of Capitalism
"Just the facts M'am, Just the facts." -- Sgt. Joe Friday
By Brooks
By Brooks


Nationalized banking, nationalized automobile manufacturing, socialized medicine, socialized energy production, community organized voting, property rights down the commode, environmentalist eco-diversity global warming zealots prosecuting government of the lawsuit for the lawsuit and by the lawsuit, you can’t do or say anything without upsetting some hyper-sensitive aggrieved victim-in-waiting, history re-written by the volume on a daily basis, and the public square dominated by the anarchistic rules for radicals. The cruel irony is that our elite leaders are doing all this in the name of the public good. One wonders just how much dope they smoked for all this nonsense to seem reasonable to them.
Oh, and memos to David Letterman, Conan OBrien, 9 News, and Bill OReilly: I turn all your shows off whenever you deliver propaganda. Sometimes I’ll get to see a whole 30 seconds of one of your programs before that happens. That’s Ok. I need the sack time more than I need your nightly political re-education. I guess the segments of your audience who consider propaganda to be news-worthy or entertainment are an easy-sell for your advertisers.
By Brooks
You can sort this table by clicking on any column.
Follow the money.
By Brooks
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins–or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom–Lucifer.” Saul Alinsky
So reads the 3rd acknowledgment at the beginning of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals–a work inspired by the devil.
Now, maybe it’s just me, but, you know, when I’m casting about for an inspiration or something motivational, the devil just doesn’t come to mind. I would have to suspend everything I know about evil, somehow wall that off in my mind, before I could look for something good about the devil to inspire me. Maybe I’m lacking in a mental capacity that great thinkers possess. Maybe Alinsky was a world-class sociopath who would stoop to any low to justify himself.
By Brooks
I am not a member of a monolithic “other” group of people who are not LGBT, who are not pro-Obama, who are not secular humanists, who are not haters of George Bush and Sarah Palin (or is it Sarah Palin and George Bush in the hierarchy of hates?), who are not anti-Christian, who are not pro-Palestinian, who are not anti-Jew, who are not believers in single-payer health care systems, who are not believers in global warming mythology, who are not Malthusian eco-doomsaying Luddites, and who are not militant in their political causes.
I and many others are not defined by what we are not. Do you hear that Margaret Cho and all you jack-booted marching Leftists? Just because you get off on organized militant communities of like-minded believers doesn’t mean the rest of us do! You’ve got everyone neatly sorted out into your camps and their camps, and you couldn’t be more wrong about the rest of the people who you have judged to be not like you–people who you know precious little about–the people who you lump together as the “other” who you constantly fight, marginalize, minimize, demean, insult, ridicule and degrade.
Your insular moral code does not transcend the boundaries of your own interests. Oh, it translates well enough inside your own movement, it just doesn’t work too well in the broader scheme of interests that all humans share for survival, thriving, fair play, opportunity, and peaceful coexistence.
The fact is you’re smart and this leaves us two possible explanations. Either you know full well that your moral code doesn’t work for all of humanity and you press on anyway with conscious intent to subjugate all of us non-believers, or, you have an incredibly sophisticated form of brainwashing that affords you the delusion that your relative morality really is applicable to all of humanity. Neither one offers much hope.
Throw the broad brushes away that you use to paint everyone you have judged to be not rainbow colored. They are needlessly harmful and divisive. If you want to get rid of hate in the world, stop hating people who are not like you. Really. Don’t pretend. Don’t wear one face inside your movement and another one outside. Stop pushing people away. Stop creating enemies.
I know that your morality, your situational ethics, need an enemy to enervate your secular belief system. I know that your basket of philosophies don’t stand on their constructive merits, that they only seem reasonable under emergency conditions that overwhelm the voices of cooler heads. Still, you’ve got to start considering the rest of humanity beyond your own private interests. We’re all getting too old for the Left’s dead-end histrionics.
The big totalitarians in history solved your moral dilemma by rubbing out the opposition by the hundreds of millions. Unless you plan to follow their example, you’d better snap out of it.
By Brooks
By Brooks
By Brooks
(Links to brief YouTube clips)
Colorado State Senator Greg Brophy
Mountain States Legal Foundation Executive Director William Perry Pendley
By Brooks
By Brooks
July 07, 2009, 4:00 a.m.
I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin
The Republicans bring a knife to a gunfight, and lose again.
By David Kahane
One of the most terrifying moments of my political life came last summer at the Republican convention in St. Paul. No, I don’t mean seeing John McCain careering around the Xcel Energy Center like Eyegore in Young Frankenstein, his face frozen in a Lon Chaney Sr. rictus grin as he reached across the aisle to his erstwhile friends in the media and got his hand bitten off. Rather, I’m referring to the aftermath of Sarah Palin’s outrageous acceptance speech, which whipped up the Rotary Club delegates into a frenzy of white-boy fury that not even heckling by a brave Code Pink embed could deter. Truly a fascist classic and one that sent shivers down our collectivist spines.
Even worse was the glaze of horror on the phizzes of the assembled heroes of the Mainstream Media. Andrea Mitchell — yes, the very same Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, whose employer saw no conflict of interest at all when she married then Fed pooh-bah Alan Greenspan — stood there gaping like a frog while the rest of the assembled Finemans and Matthewses and Olbermanns scurried around like roaches when the light gets turned on: What the hell just hit us? For one horrible moment, it looked as if the carefully crafted plans of David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, George Soros, and the Second Chief Directorate, first department, of the old KGB were about to gang agley. [Read more…]
By Brooks
In America, government fixes all Prices (called “fee schedules”) for health care devices, drugs, services, and procedures that are provided with public money (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the VA, etc.) The private insurance market also uses these government fixed prices, but usually at a discounted rate–still price fixing, just at a discount.
Health care price-fixing happens at the political nexus where interest groups and lobbyists meet legislators and regulators. These politics do not yield the sort of equilibrium you get with the market forces of supply and demand. No one involved in establishing these price points actually has to pay for what they’re pricing. Therefore the demand element of this health care pricing mechanism is a fiction. Prices that come out of this process will only randomly reflect what real supply and demand would, and will only randomly be rational.
Meanwhile, legislators and regulators do not operate in a vacuum. They get ALL of their demand side pricing information from a) providers and b) insurance companies. They get ALL of their supply side pricing information from a) providers, b) insurance companies and c) manufacturers.
No inputs to health care price-fixing come from the actual consumers of health care, and the consumers of health care are the ONLY element in the health care market who are CAPABLE of providing real demand information–because they are the ones who actually pay for it!
To summarize, providers want higher health care prices because they earn more money that way. Insurance companies want higher health care prices because they earn more money on more expensive products and services. Manufacturers want higher health care prices because they earn more money for their goods. And legislators and regulators are disinterested third parties who exist to be persuaded to control price points, where all the persuasion comes from parties who have an interest in higher price points.
This is the debate we should be having. Any proposed structural change to our health care market that does not address what fundamentally controls the price of health care in America will not materially improve matters.
Our current system of health care pricing is disconnected from consumers and can only result in a poor allocation of health care to meet real needs. This is what we have today. If we don’t change this, we will never optimize the provision of health care, with the cost of health care, and with a rational price for that health care.
Government price fixing causes shortages–an economic fact of life whether the object is gasoline or health care.
By Brooks
By Brooks
By Brooks
By Brooks
By Brooks
By Brooks
“[T]he failure to answer “no” to any question on this declaration shall serve as a disclosure that material assistance to an organization identified on the U.S. Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List has been provided by myself or my organization.” [Read more…]
By Brooks
By Brooks
By VICTOR DAVIS HANSON | Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:20 PM PT
Are you confused by all that has changed since President Barack Obama took office in January? If so, you’re not alone. Perhaps, though, this handy guide to Age of Obama “logic” might be of some assistance. [Read more…]
By Brooks