{"id":2665,"date":"2011-10-15T07:00:54","date_gmt":"2011-10-15T14:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/2011\/10\/15\/community-reinvestment-act\/"},"modified":"2011-10-18T12:59:44","modified_gmt":"2011-10-18T19:59:44","slug":"community-reinvestment-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/2011\/10\/community-reinvestment-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Community Reinvestment Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>             It&#8217;s The CRA, Stupid!<\/h2>\n<p><span>Investors Business Daily, Posted 10\/12\/2011 06:54 PM ET<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Meltdown:<\/strong> To their chagrin, the  media elite moderating the latest GOP presidential debate got schooled  in the real causes of the financial crisis by the line-up of candidates.<\/p>\n<p>At Tuesday&#8217;s forum, the Washington Post&#8217;s Karen Tumulty asked Michele  Bachmann if she thought Wall Street bankers have been sufficiently  punished for &#8220;the damage they did to the economy.&#8221; Only, the Minnesota  congresswoman didn&#8217;t take the bait, instead giving the misinformed  Tumulty a much-needed education.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If you look at the problem with the economic meltdown, you can trace  it right back to the federal government,&#8221; she said. &#8220;It was the federal  government that pushed the subprime loans. It was the federal  government that pushed the Community Reinvestment Act.&#8221;<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>One of the worst rules on the books, the CRA fed the subprime bubble  by requiring banks to underwrite a share of their loans in high-risk,  unprofitable areas.<\/p>\n<p>Newt Gingrich backed her up. Even media darling Ron Paul chimed in  that the CRA led to &#8220;malinvestment&#8221; among banks. &#8220;But the federal  government has also deregulated them,&#8221; Tumulty protested.<\/p>\n<p>Not in the way she thinks. Starting in the mid-1990s, in a major  switch, regulators no longer enforced traditional lending rules. Prudent  underwriting was deemed racist and banks were judged on how &#8220;flexible&#8221;  they could be in qualifying &#8220;nontraditional&#8221;credit cases. The more they  bent their old rules and the more lower-income minority borrowers they  rubberstamped for loans, the better they did on their all-important CRA  examinations.<\/p>\n<p>In the run-up to the crisis, boosting minority home ownership became  the goal of the U.S. government. And incredibly, lowering  mortgage-underwriting standards to achieve that goal became government  policy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We had lending standards lowered for the first time in American  history,&#8221; Bachmann duly noted. &#8220;The fault goes back to the federal  government.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That  seemed to quiet the debate moderators. But after the debate, the  Washington Post swiftly posted a &#8220;fact check&#8221; piece on Bachmann that  accused her of spreading canards. &#8220;The notion that the CRA \u2014 approved  nearly 35 years ago in 1977 \u2014 had anything to do with a lending crisis  that flowered in 2007 and 2008 has been roundly discredited,&#8221; the Post  sniffed, quoting CRA regulators who have a vested interest in protecting  the act.<\/p>\n<p><em>This red herring has been used before. What the Post &#8220;fact-checkers&#8221;  don&#8217;t tell readers is that the Clinton administration completely rewrote  the CRA in 1995. Either they missed this critical fact or they knew  about it, and deliberately misled readers.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A decade before the crisis, bank examiners for the first time  enforced numerical lending goals in predominantly minority areas. And  they mandated banks use &#8220;flexible underwriting standards&#8221; to meet them.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, HUD ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to &#8220;assist  insured depository institutions (banks) to meet their obligations under  the Community Reinvestment Act.&#8221; The mortgage giants gobbled up the  risky CRA loans originated by banks, creating a feeding frenzy.<\/p>\n<p>A recent Fed study of CRA loans identified them as a type of subprime  loan and noted that &#8220;CRA-related loans performed in a comparable manner  to other subprime loans.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>CRA actually egged on &#8220;too-big-to-fail&#8221; institutions by rewarding  banks that met their CRA goals with merger approvals. More than 90% of  the $4.5 trillion in post-1995 CRA loan &#8220;commitments&#8221; reported by the  National Community Reinvestment Coalition were made by just four banks \u2014  Citibank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase \u2014 and banks  they merged with.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If banks failed to meet those (CRA) rules,&#8221; Bachmann said, &#8220;then the  federal government said we won&#8217;t let you merge, we won&#8217;t let you grow.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In an era of mergers, they either complied or died. And inner-city  groups like Acorn made doubly sure they did, branding any bank giant  that didn&#8217;t make multibillion-dollar subprime pledges &#8220;racist.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This crisis traces directly back to the CRA. It&#8217;s the common thread  running through the banks, subprime lenders, Fannie and Freddie and even  Wall Street securities firms who have taken the fall for the crisis.<\/p>\n<p>Yet Democrat financial reforms, embodied in the Dodd-Frank Act, don&#8217;t  lay a glove on the chief culprit. In fact, the administration is  scheming behind the scenes right now to expand the CRA&#8217;s powers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s The CRA, Stupid! Investors Business Daily, Posted 10\/12\/2011 06:54 PM ET Meltdown: To their chagrin, the media elite moderating the latest GOP presidential debate got schooled in the real causes of the financial crisis by the line-up of candidates. At Tuesday&#8217;s forum, the Washington Post&#8217;s Karen Tumulty asked Michele Bachmann if she thought Wall [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[73],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2665","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-progressive-finance","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2665\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}