{"id":2175,"date":"2010-08-27T08:00:12","date_gmt":"2010-08-27T15:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/2010\/08\/27\/sb-1070-appellant-brief\/"},"modified":"2010-08-27T08:00:12","modified_gmt":"2010-08-27T15:00:12","slug":"sb-1070-appellant-brief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/2010\/08\/sb-1070-appellant-brief\/","title":{"rendered":"S.B. 1070 Appellant brief"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CONCLUSION<\/p>\n<p>The United States faced a heavy burden in establishing its entitlement to a preliminary injunction enjoining Arizona from enforcing S.B. 1070. The United States fell far short of meeting that burden. The district court\u2019s finding that the United States is likely to prevail on its claims that sections 2(B), 3, 5(C), and 6 of S.B. 1070 are preempted failed to apply the correct standard for the United States\u2019 facial challenge to these provisions, failed in its analysis of Congress\u2019 intent, and erroneously accepted at face value all of the United States\u2019 factual assertions. The serious errors in the district court\u2019s preliminary injunction order require that the order be vacated.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/appellantsopeningbrief-us-v-arizona.pdf\" title=\"US v Arizona SB 1070 Appellant Brief\">US v Arizona SB 1070 Appellant Brief<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CONCLUSION The United States faced a heavy burden in establishing its entitlement to a preliminary injunction enjoining Arizona from enforcing S.B. 1070. The United States fell far short of meeting that burden. The district court\u2019s finding that the United States is likely to prevail on its claims that sections 2(B), 3, 5(C), and 6 of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[42,24],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2175","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-constitution","7":"category-court","8":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2175"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elbertcounty.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}