– and –
Pat Condell’s excellent commentary The Religion of Fear
——————————————————————————————————–
"Just the facts M'am, Just the facts." -- Sgt. Joe Friday
By Brooks
By Brooks
3/22/08 note:
Since commissioners are elected at large in the county, It looks like the petition requirements are too high of a threshold for Schroeder, Neumann or Thayer to petition on to the primary ballot. It looks like Valdez wouldn’t need so many signatures to petition on, however, he’d have to do so as something other than a Republican or Democrat. So, it’s probably safe to assume that Schwab and Goetz will sit two of the commissioners seats, and it’s still a horse race between Wyer, Shipper, and Thomasson for the third seat. Andy’s a nice enough guy, probably not enough executive skill for me. Shipper, former lobbyist, probably too hooked up for me. Thomasson, all about transparency, will he remain so once he’s on the inside? Perhaps we shall see.
By Brooks
Now here’s what we like to see in Elbert County, good ol’ fashioned objective reporting. A tip of the hat to Gary Begin of the West Elbert County Sun, Thursday, 3/6/2008, page 5.
I still want to see the Democrats do well in Elbert County this political season because that’s the only way to get the Left out of the Elbert County Republican Party and back home in the Democratic Party where they belong. If the Republicans keep winning everything around here the Left will just continue their masquerade.
But while it’s no secret that deep in the heart of most Democrats you’ll find a firmly rooted prejudice that sees Republicans as stupid morons, the Democrats will do much better in November if they at least appear to treat their opponents as legitimate.
Also, memo to Editor Hill, western Elbert County already has a one-trick-pony fish wrap where Democrats can find their weekly fix of anti-commissioner, anti-growth, anti-development, and pro-intrusive-government mantras. Please consider taking the West Elbert County Sun in a more constructive direction.
By Brooks
By Brooks
Principles shouldn’t be so inflexible that strict adherence elevates a worse alternative.
By Brooks
At some age, mere survival usually brings a certain enlightenment. You come to know when something emanates from the south end of a northbound bull. You know the difference between what works and what looks good. You’ve learned the fine line between art and crap. You know to judge ideas by their predictive value, not by how seductive they seem. At a certain age, you know, or should know these things.
Next Tuesday, February 5th, Coloradoans are supposed to bring this sort of experience to their political caucuses to make decisions about representatives and issues. [Read more…]
By Brooks
By Brooks
(click to enlarge)
From: B.I. [mailto:brooks@forethought.net]
To: jh@adapt-a-life.com; Andraija@aol.comJ.H.
Thank you for making my point about “self-selected.”
Brooks [Read more…]
By Brooks
The Last King of Java
Indonesia ‘s former president offers a model of Muslim tolerance
BY BRET STEPHENS
JAKARTA, Indonesia–Suppose for a moment that the single most influential religious leader in the Muslim world openly says “I am for Israel.” Suppose he believes not only in democracy but in the liberalism of America’s founding fathers. Suppose that, unlike so many self-described moderate Muslims who say one thing in English and another in their native language, his message never alters. Suppose this, and you might feel as if you’ve descended into Neocon Neverland.
In fact, you have arrived in Jakarta and are sitting in the small office of an almost totally blind man of 66 named Abdurrahman Wahid. A former president of Indonesia, he is the spiritual leader of the Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), an Islamic organization of some 40 million members. Indonesians know him universally as Gus Dur, a title of affection and respect for this descendant of Javanese kings. In the U.S. and Europe he is barely spoken of at all–which is both odd and unfortunate, seeing as he is easily the most important ally the West has in the ideological struggle against Islamic radicalism.
Conversation begins with some old memories. In the early 1960s, Mr. Wahid, whose paternal grandfather founded the NU in 1926 and whose father was Indonesia’s first minister of religious affairs, won a scholarship to Al-Azhar University in Cairo, which for 1,000 years had been Sunni Islam’s premier institution of higher learning. Mr. Wahid hated it. [Read more…]
By Brooks
By Brooks
NYTimes on Pakistan lawyer demonstration “The pressure on the lawyers is far more intense now than it was even in the spring, when their anger had been stoked by General Musharraf’s attempt to dismiss the chief justice. The step was seen as a direct threat to the independence of the judiciary, and hence themselves. Led by Aitzaz Ahsan,…
Aitzaz Ahsan is an active member of Pakistan Peoples Party. “Among the express goals for which the Party was formed were the establishment of an egalitarian democracy and the application of socialistic ideas to realize economic and social justice.
The Life Chairperson – Pakistan Peoples Party Benazir Bhutto
Pakistan Sharia Law “The Enforcement of Sharia Act 1991 affirms the supremacy of the sharia, (defined in the Act as the injunctions of Islam as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah) as the supreme law of Pakistan. The Act states that all statute law is to be interpreted in light of the sharia and that all Muslim citizens of Pakistan shall observe the sharia and act accordingly.
.
Why is the NYT so sympathetic to the Pakistani sharia left? The NYT wouldn’t even exist if the sharia left controlled America.
By Brooks
TRW, October 07
.
.
.
.
.
TRW, August 07
“Elbert County does not have a sales tax, but our commissioners will ask for one in November. Their reasoning is that the Elbert County Road and Bridge Department needs the money to, you guessed it, repair and maintain Elbert’s woeful system of roads. Unfortunately, the board of county commissioners is the very group that has been shifting money out of the road and bridge department for other projects that caused gross deficiencies in the first place. In what can only be described as a move that demonstrates shortsightedness, Elbert’s commissioners say that if the tax increase passes, all of the money will be earmarked for road and bridge. Before you start calling us hypocrites, understand that if this money is put toward that department, there is no way to get it back into the general fund without breaking the law. Lord knows the road and bridge department is a deserving group, but it is irresponsible to put all of the money from a tax increase into a place where the money can’t be used when emergencies occur. We do have emergencies from time to time.”
However you parse it, the lure of public money overcame their disdain for the BOCC.
By Brooks
Peace Prize Committee Disbands By William S. Smith : 19 Oct 2007 http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=101907A
“I always thought the peace prize was a bunch of crap given to whiney, self-aggrandizing, busybodies by a bunch of self-important, narcissistic gullible, retired, left-wing, Norwegian, gasbag politicos.” Senator Inouye
By Brooks
By Brooks
By Randal O’Toole, The Antiplanner [excerpts]
. . .Utopianism and hubris would not be problems if planners and their architect gurus merely said to people, “Here are some ideas that will improve your life. Why don’t you try them out?” According to Peter Hall’s history of modern urban planning, Cities of Tomorrow [excerpt], most “of the early visions of the planning movement stemmed from the anarchist movement.”
. . .Sadly, most planners ended up following the authoritarian model. As Hall observes, “in half a century or more of bureaucratic practice, planning had degenerated into a negative regulatory machine, designed to stifle all initiative, all creativity.”
Yet I would argue that such authoritarianism is an inevitable result of the planning process. After all, if you have a vision of how people ought to live, and if you really believe that vision will significantly improve the world, then you don’t dare risk letting that vision be corrupted by the vagueries of the free market. So you turn to government to impose that vision on the world.
In sum, planners have historically believed that they could use urban design as a form of social engineering to perfect the world and the people in it. They acted on this belief by using the power of government to impose their designs through zoning and other regulations. The planning profession today continues to be shaped by these ideas.
By Brooks
“The Western mind-set—that if we respect them, they’re going to respect us, that if we indulge and appease and condone and so on, the problem will go away—is delusional. The problem is not going to go away. Confront it [Islam], or it’s only going to get bigger.”
Ayaan Hirsi Ali
By Brooks
Switching party affiliations –after an election– to the majority side says more about Stafford than it does about Republicans. It says when the going gets tough, Debbie hits the road. It says her many years in a party she fundamentally disagreed with were disingenuous and a fraud. It says her loyalty takes a back seat to opportunism. None of these conclusions seem to warrant the euphoria on Democrat blogs, web sites and newspapers over this news.
By Brooks
RE: TRW 10/11/07 a TRW 10/11/07 b
After you get through the repetition from the wisdom of former commissioner Dunn and the TRW=judge&jury legal conclusions about alleged open meetings violations, you get to this moral point, “[T]he public trust — your trust — must always be considered as the paramount responsibility of elected officials.” And, “Trust of the people should trump the convenience of the commissioners.”
In principle these are good ideas, however, in the context of the TRW’s weekly ECN attacks on the BOCC, treating them as whipping boys and girls for their leftist agenda, and considering the virtual certainty that no matter what the BOCC did, the beatings would continue (because the BOCC are not leftists and never will be,) these moral arguments ring as hollow as the pumpkins on my front porch.
You never have to look long to find the 800 lb. gorilla in the TRW’s living room.
By Brooks
By Brooks
(click to enlarge)
In reviewing many BOCC agendas, it appears the same disclaimer given in the 9/12/07 agenda is routinely given, and it also seems that the subject matter under “County Attorney” sections is never disclosed ahead of time. This begs the question of why Abe21 suddenly chose to take offense over a standard protocol. Also, why did they not approach the BOCC to change the agenda protocol? That would have been the constructive thing to do if they were really interested in contributing to “a better Elbert.”