Now, see, your average Leftist will look at this hot mess of a conclusion and get a warm feeling in her belly that the government is out there on the forefront of pollution, actively protecting her.
But the language says nothing, does nothing, solves nothing, recommends no specific remediation, and only suggests that it would be good if some unspecified person kept thinking about something unspecified, to move the world forward in an expedient manner toward a goal that could take a very long time to accomplish – that we already know! – undo the effects of man.
The ultimate irony is all of those EPA goals will involve reestablishing a prior status or condition to the environment – that is, turn the clock backward – the only way the EPA knows to go forward. But since we’ve all seen where we’ve been, why on earth do we need a huge expensive government agency to tell us what we already know?
“Moving forward with the end in mind.” Good grief! Make up an acronym – an RAO in this case – and feed it to the rubes out there in flyover country. This stuff rivals the brilliant pronouncements of Peter Sellers’ Chauncey Gardner character.
God only knows how much this study cost. But I guess if it helps a Leftist sleep better at night, it must be worth it because there’s just no other point to this pablum.